• Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    These polls are as idiotic as the Brexit Referendum was.

    People have no fucking clue what’s going on and they answer by their “gut feeling”. So it’s all down to the way the question is formed.

    And it’s not a “yes” or “no” type of situation either.

    • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      So your argument is what exactly? That the poll is flawed… so there isn’t a majority or plurality? You realize that both for and against could have been answering by their “gut feeling”… a 50/50 split kind of proves the point that it’s not just a few thousand like was claimed.

      Of course if you have a better source showing that Americans are happy with spending more money in Ukraine that’s of higher quality I’m all ears.

      • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        My argument is that linking a shitty poll that paint the issue in black or white does nothing to help to paint the picture of public opinion on the russia’s attack on Ukraine and how people feel about it.

        • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Can you show how the poll is misrepresenting it as a black/white issue?

          Do you have ANY better statistical resource?

          • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Can you show how the poll is misrepresenting it as a black/white issue? I can, but you don’t seem to be genuinely interested, so I’m not going to waste my time.

            Do you have ANY better statistical resource? No, but sometimes no resource is of more quality than a misleading poll.

            • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              I can, but you don’t seem to be genuinely interested, so I’m not going to waste my time.

              Sounds like that’s a no then…

              No, but sometimes no resource is of more quality than a misleading poll.

              If you can provide any evidence that it’s misleading… I’ll take it. But you’ve failed to do so and continue to whinge about it even though you’ve got nothing better to replace the poll as evidence.

                • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  You don’t respond well at all… When asked for anything to defend your stance, you got bumpkiss nothing.

                  • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    I’ve already “defended my stance” (debate lord lol), but you failed to comprehend it. So I’m not going chew it up for you. If you’re not smart to discern a good poll from a shit one, there’s not much thinking I can do for you.

                    I’m sure you can find polls on facebook that will prove (to you) that 5G causes covid.