• amio@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    Well, at least people were saved from terrible tra*ma by cl*verly h*ding the “u” in “ab*sive”. Can’t tell that’s what it says at all…

    • jagungal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      An alternative explanation is that sites like TikT*k are trying to please advertisers by reducing coverage of videos that talk about sensitive topics like trauma, suicide, and death, and that behaviour has been blindly copied by zoomers who are getting their primary internet exposure from Tiktok.

    • Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Oh this word might hurt someone, lets skewer it so not only does it bring all the focus to the word itself, but forces people to think about the word specifically and how big of a deal it should be!

      Whoever did this really needs a smack upside the head

      • threeduck@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Trigger warning: the word tra*ma

        I like to think of myself as pretty supportive, but is there really any evidence that specifically reading the word “trauma” is traumatic? And if so, is the removal of the “U” really a solution to that?

        Because it seems like asterixing one letter is more of a performative measure to signify ones support for the overall cause rather than an actually means to reduce suffering.

        How close can the “U” be before it starts to upset someone?

        “Tra u ma”

        Uuuuuuuuuuuuu Tra ma Uuuuuuuuuuuuuu

        I don’t believe that someone who is affected by the word “trauma” would view the above examples with a complete non-reaction because the U is vaguely obfuscated.

        Like, we can agree that the asterix is just a display of consideration to someone, rather than an actually effective measure, right?

        • TotallyHuman@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s actually counterproductive! People who want to screen stuff about abuse from their internet experience can set up filters. Those filters are broken when you censor the relevant words!

          • Rediphile@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah but does that matter if using the asterisk helps those not the victim of abuse feel better about their day? They are the real victims 🤣

            • amio@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              If the word triggers some symptom, then why would that same word, “hidden” by a trick that wouldn’t faze a six-year-old, be any less harmful?

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    This all seems correct as far as I know, but generally speaking we should reject infographics without source info

  • owenfromcanada@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    According to my licensed psychiatrist, trauma is anything hurtful or harmful that impacts your behavior or patterns of thinking. The clinical term is actually more broad than the general public conception of the word.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      even in medical terms (not a doctor) getting a tooth pulled or scraping your knee is trauma.

      For all people posture that “the internet overreacts” they also overreact to the so-called overreaction

  • morganth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I agree with the other three, but this is wrong about “narcissists”. “Narcissistic Personality Disorder” is a diagnosis, but calling someone a “narcissist” isn’t. That’s just a description of someone’s personality. It’s much older than the diagnosis, going back to the Greek myth of Narcissus. The diagnosis doesn’t get to co-opt the much older usage.

    • topinambour_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah it’s just the higher stage of selfishness. You can be selfish, egoistic, etc. Then you reach Narcissus level, or worst, the pond/lake level.

    • exocrinous@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      You’re not speaking ancient Greek, mate, you’re speaking English, and your use is informed by the history of the English language. The use of Nar******t in pop culture is largely informed by Christopher Lach’s 1979 book The Culture Of Narcissism, which made the argument that contemporary American culture was normalising clinical NPD. You didn’t learn to call people nar******ts by reading ancient Greek myths, and I know that for a fact because the ancient greeks didn’t go around using the word. To them, it was just some guy’s name. You learned the word from someone who learned the word from someone who learned the word from Lasch’s book, and from the ableist books that came after. Your folk etymology explanation that the pop culture use comes directly from Greek is missing a lot of important and relevant intermediate steps.

  • John_McMurray@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Tangentially related, “Cultural Appropriation” was a an anthropological/historian term that meant defining and controlling another’s culture. A good example is the English making it illegal for Scots to wear kilts in the 1700s. It is not personally using a hairstyle associated with another group despite what the term sounds like. The people that use that meaning literally culturally appropriated the term from the original group, under the real meaning of the term. People trying to tell spanish speakers that they are “Latinx” is another example of the original meaning.

  • Nobody@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Be honest with yourself, but don’t glorify victimhood. Being a victim fucking sucks. It’s not something to aspire to. I have my issues, but I know I’m not a victim.

    I’ve been blessed not to have to deal with abuse the way others have. I don’t want to cheapen what they went through by classifying something unpleasant I went through in personal interactions as actual abuse or trauma.

    • psivchaz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s so difficult to try and have this nuanced take with people. I’m NOT trivializing or saying you should "just suck it up " I’m suggesting that you treat mental illness like an illness: Seek treatment, follow professional advice, and be honest with yourself and the professionals you’re seeing. If I broke my leg, but refused to get a cast because I felt it was really a problem with my arm, while lying to every doctor I meet about what happened, people would get very sick of my nonsense in short order.

  • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Also “Antisocial” does not mean introverted. It means to react violently to social situations.

  • banazir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Dear Americans: Psychotic doesn’t mean what you think it means. Stop using it please.

  • LostWon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’d’ve liked to see “schizophrenic,” “antisocial,” and “psychopath” among possible others, but this is indeed pretty cool.