• Peasley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I guess I’m smart enough to install opensuse, but dumb enough that I somehow got slow pacman.

    I kid you not, on my hardware zypper is the fastest between ubuntu apt, fedora dnf, and arch pacman. dnf was the second-fastest on my hardware, with apt and pacman being pretty sluggish

    I’ve also used portage which was even slower, but probably not a fair comparison considering how much more complex it is.

      • sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Trust me my friend, a person can make a c program that’s much, much slower than one in python. That’s a meaningless point.

        Sure, c allows for more control and thus the possibility for a quicker program but that’s just it, a possibility.

        Zipper, though written in c++, can only download one thing at a time. This is why it’s so slow

      • Zangoose@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        In the grand scheme of things the difference between C, C++, and Python isn’t meaningful when operating over a network (edit: for a single-user system). It’s very likely that the difference for thread OP is just caused by weaker connections to specific repos.

        We’re talking about a package manager, not a game, network server, etc. On a basic level the package manager only needs to download files from a network and install them (OS syscalls for reading/writing files, these are exposed C functions or assembly routines), or delegate to a specific package’s build setup (which will also likely be written in a compiled language)