Is there any reason, beyond corporate greed, for SMS messages to cost so much?

If I get it right, an SMS message is just a short string of data, no different from a message we send in a messenger. If so, then what makes them so expensive? If we’d take Internet plans and consider how much data an SMS takes, we should pay tiny fraction of a cent for each message; why doesn’t that happen?

  • Obinice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    SMS are completely free? I mean yeah, they cost money back in 2009, but that was a loooooong time ago.

    Wherever you are, you’re being completely screwed, yeah.

  • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Wait, I haven’t paid for text messages in probably 15 years. Where do they still charge for SMS? It’s usually unlimited with any plan that I’ve seen

    • tiredofsametab@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think my phone plan (in Japan) charges for outgoing SMS. I don’t think it’s much. I think some plans maybe include it. We all use LINE here (like much of Europe uses Whatsapp) so most people aren’t sending text messages regularly if at all.

    • morrowind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Really basic plans still charge you. When I was in school, my parents gave me a dumb phone with a plan that cost 10 cents per minute of calling or 10 cents per sms. MMS didn’t even work. Ridiculously expensive, but at the amount I was using still cheaper than anything else

  • scoobford@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    SMS piggybacks on existing signals to and from your phone. They are entirely free, and have been in a lot of places for a long time.

    You’re getting screwed. At least it’s a good reason for your contacts to switch to signal or simpleX?

  • kindenough@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    What are you paying for SMS? I pay 6 euro a month for unlimited sms and calls and 2 GB data. 50+ mobiel is my provider. Now they offer my plan with the first year for 2,5 euro. Dirt cheap.

  • Apepollo11@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I know it doesn’t help, but Europeans have always been amazed how much you guys were charged for SMS. Even in 1999, over here messages cost a fraction of what you were charged - that you pay for them at all these days is just mind-boggling.

    • nave@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’re in Russia. I don’t know anybody in the US (I assume you’re talking about) who pays for SMS.

        • Apepollo11@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I always wanted a Nokia - I know it was a cliche, but I was amazed at how indestructible they were. Even when they did actually break apart, you could just pick up the bits, clip them back together, and it would just work again - with no visible damage.

          Also, SNAKE

  • thefool@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Unlimited SMS is on most cell phone plans nowadays, at least in Canada.

    On a slightly different tack: I run a website, and I choose not to implement SMS for notifications - only email. Email is free. Adding SMS, even at $0.007 per message, could add up to big bucks.

  • viking@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Because they can, simple as that. Or well, could. I don’t think I have sent a single text message in a solid decade now, and received only 2FA messages and pickup codes for storage boxes when something was delivered while I wasn’t home.

    I really thought SMS is a remnant of the past at this point, just like fax systems. Working for legacy purposes, nothing more.

    • Maeve@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Are you kidding? Everyone I know, even the kids, prefer sms. You can answer when and/or if you have time or feel like it

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Nobody I know uses it, seriously. Every person is using whatsapp, and a handful privacy minded ones are on signal.

        Not sure I’m getting your point though, I can answer on every single message protocol whenever I have time or feel like it?

        • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I used Signal for several years until some spotty areas near the beach it wasn’t working, so I worried it was unreliable and I abandoned Signal & went back to using whatever default SMS my cell provider has on my phone 🫤 Now y’all are reminding me to go back to Signal. Imma go do that now

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    its crazier than you think… the original sms messaging was sent over an already existent, in process data path… they didnt really have to add much to the system to accommodate it, yet charged an obscene amount per message

    the answer is simple; because they can

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It still does.

      SMS is sent within unassigned space within management frames.

      Cell works kind of like ATM - Asynchronous Transfer Mode, which unlike packet-switched networks, continually transmits frames (even empty ones), as a means of ensuring stable, performant delivery.

      Like ATM, cell kind of does the same thing (that is, when it makes a connection).

      Within those frames are segments which are allocated for different purposes, someone got the great idea to transmit bits within a segment that wasn’t yet assigned to anything by the standard.

      Those segments can hold… 160 characters (IIRC), and for technical reasons, this became 140 characters (again, IIRC).

      So whenever your phone pings a tower, those frames get sent. From a bare transmission perspective, there’s no additional cost. The cost is on the backend hardware that extracts the SMS and the routing of it. So there’s some cost, but at 10 cents per message, there’s got to be 9.9 cents of gross profit (just guessing).

    • AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Messages went from $.05, to $.10, to $.20 to send and receive. That was in the span of three years. All of the companies said it wasn’t collision. They just happened to arrive upon massive increases separately.

      If I recall, one of the CEOs said “We’re raising the prices to save customers money. This way they’ll be an unlimited plan”

      The telcos should have been broken up then. Instead we’ve seen even more mergers.

      • Edit: forgot to include the years. This was in the U.S. circa 2005-2008. Telcos have moved onto other sleezy practices now.*
  • rdyoung@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Where are you that you’re paying anything extra for sms? They used to be expensive because they could charge that much, now that are included in even the cheapest prepaid plans. If you are paying per message, that’s a you problem and you need to find another wireless provider.

    • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you need to send SMS commercially they’re still generally priced at $0.03 each. I just had to deal with that because some users will apparently only turn on MFA if they can get the codes by txt.

      • rdyoung@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        OP didn’t clarify personal versus business. I’m aware of how much businesses get ripped off, I’ve looked into using the short codes for promoting my own business and shit is not cheap.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      There is a large contrast in this regard between NA and Europe. In Europe data is dirt cheap and wifi is usually available anyways so messaging over whatsapp/signal/whatever is much more common than trying to use SMS. In America public wifi is extremely rare and businesses are so spread out that coverage is limited… people also tend to use iPhones which default you into their shitty iMessage - SMS was also traditionally much cheaper so it’s more of a habit in NA.

      • rdyoung@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        None of that is actually true as a contrast.

        There are tons of free wifi networks from hotels to restaurants, etc.

        None of what you are saying makes any sense.

        • SolOrion@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          There’s literally like four places with free wifi in my entire town. Most of the restaurants don’t have it, and we only have two hotels… neither of which has properly free wifi- you have to get a room to use it.

          • rdyoung@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            If you want to get technical, my town (really a village) has zero free wifi networks. It’s the larger city to my south that has all of the restaurants, hotels, retail, etc with free wifi.