• Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      If you actually had an argument, you’d be able to present a variety of proof, instead of just posting the same graph over and over.

        • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          None of those charts changes the fact that in 1960 a pair minimum wage workers could have brought a house in about five years.

          • iopq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            The woman probably didn’t get the job back then because she’s married and they expect her to quit once she gets pregnant

            I know because that’s what happened to my mother

            • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              So, she actually had a job and could have kept it? A quick look at any source, including Superman comic books of the era, will show that there were millions of working women in America in the 1960s.

              You keep proving me right, over and over again.

              • iopq@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Yes, but she wouldn’t get a promotion because they thought it would be a waste. She ended up having me and being a stay at home mom

                Women entered the workforce, but they had a much higher wages gap vs. men, it wasn’t until the 80s that most women started working