Full post on Reddit. Final paragraphs:

And I know that sounds bad. I know! I know this basically all sounds like “you prefer 5E to these other games because you have to actually try to play them?” But the answer is actually yeah, exactly! It’s not that I’m checked out on my phone or something, but I’ve learned I’m not actually interested in thinking too much about my part at the table. I think being there at game night with friends is fun, but I mostly just want to be along for the ride until it’s time to roll some dice to hit something and let the other players figure out what to do otherwise, maybe get in some banter-in character in between encounters, and chill. In everything else I’ve played, I’m dead weight if I’m not actively participating. In 5E, I can just kind of vibe until it’s time to roll to unlock a door or stab someone, and I’m not penalized for doing that. The game is neither loose enough that it needs my constant input outside of combat, nor complex enough to need any serious tactical decisions. That’s a very comfortable spot for me!

So yeah. I imagine there’s a lot of players who would prefer other systems if they tried them, but I’m not one of them. And I imagine there’s actually a lot more people like me at tables than you’d expect! Hopefully this gives some insight into why someone would still prefer 5E over everything else, even after giving a lot of other games a shot. Thanks for giving me a chance.

Interesting reflective statement from a 5e player.

  • Infynis@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    This guy’s opinion is totally valid, but I would not want him at my table. My favorite part of TTRPGs is the collaborative storytelling. It is a lot of work for everyone, but that’s what makes it so rewarding. Your GM is putting a lot of effort in no matter what anyway, so it’s nice to get that back from the players as well

  • Kichae@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t know, this doesn’t sound very reflective to me at all. The poster is just making a lot of general statements about games it’s not clear they’ve even played.

    Every one of these games is as simple or as complicated as we want to make them. They can be pared down or beefed up at will. How much investment you need to make at the table is dictated more by who’s sitting around it with you than what’s printed in the book. And most of these games have much, much smaller books than 5e.

    And the one that I play that doesn’t, doesn’t require any more investment than 5e if you don’t want it to.

    With less popular games, though, you tend to get more fanatical player bases. It may be harder as a lone player to find a chill table. But if your already chill table is trying to convince you to try something else…

    Like, no one needs to play apologetics for 5e. It’s the biggest TTRPG of all time. A case for it does not need to be made. The fans of every other game are just trying to sell their own interests to the largest known market for the genre, because they want people to play with, too. D&D does not need people to justify it in response.

    • copacetic@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      He has been “playing one campaign or another since mid-2014”. Also, “Of the last three years, one was spent entirely on a level 1-10 campaign of Pathfinder 2E, with the other two years jumping between Shadowdark, Mork Borg, Blades in the Dark, Monster of the Week, and finally a Heart: the City Beneath campaign that’s ending next week.”

      Also, he writes “with the exception of PF2E, all the other systems I’ve tried are less mechanically demanding.” So he seems to have at least a vague understanding of multiple systems. Enough to voice an opinion at least.

  • timgrant@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Fair points. I’m a walking rules encyclopedia type, and I’ve been in a number of games where I was like, “What the hell am I supposed to be doing?” And not having any fun.

    On the other hand, I’ve brought “D&D only” people along for the ride on other games with good success. The trick is running a good “tutorial level” introductory adventure, where nobody is either bored or frustrated. That’s going to involve introducing the mechanics in digestible bites.

    Funny thing about a D&D only mindset is that there are games that are much simpler, where thinking tactically is much less important.

  • Bye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I agree with the post. I don’t want game night to be a second job or a mental investment. I just want to show up and play something. And I don’t want to grind away figuring out how to play optimally, or wait for others to do so. I just want to dungeon crawl and hit things with my sword and do some light occasional RP.

    • Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t want game night to be a second job or a mental investment. I just want to show up and play something

      It’s interesting, because actually this part is one of the reason why I don’t play D&D. Everytime I try a D&D game, It’s quickly think about how to spend your XP wisely because you’re impacting a whole progression tree, and if you choose the right feats you’d get a combo or whatever and then the whole combat looks quite intimidating when you start thinking how the party should work to be the most efficient at overcoming an challenge.

      While tons of other RPG are more like sit down at the table, have a laid back chat with NPC, and sometimes roll a couple of dice.

      I don’t say that your point of view or way to play is wrong, but find interesting that your premise to play D&D is my premise to not to play D&D

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m the same except I’d rather avoid action as much as possible. I know it’s technically another RP opportunity, but my brain turns off as soon we start ruffling pages and rolling dice. A session with like 3 dice rolls, just to throw in a little randomness, is my ideal

      • Elevator7009@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        If they are at a full table of people who do not want to play that way, maybe. But if this person is at a table of people with similar attitudes, with a GM who enjoys that kind of vibe, there is no slack to be picked up, no group feeling of “why isn’t this person contributing” and resentment.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve talked about how I really like Fate, and how if you have players like the one in this post it won’t really work. Fate requires players to engage with the game- think about how aspects apply, think about when declaring a story detail would be cool, and so on. If you just DND style phone it is, it’s not going to sing.

    I imagine this kind of player would hate it.

    And that’s fine. This guy found his niche and enjoy it. But wow I do not really want to play with him.