fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 6 months agothis one goes out to the arts & humanitiesmander.xyzimagemessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down10
arrow-up16arrow-down1imagethis one goes out to the arts & humanitiesmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square16fedilink
minus-squarerustyfish@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoI think approximation is the right word here. It’s pretty cool and all and I’m looking forward how it will develop. But it’s mostly a fun toy. I’m stoked for the moment the tech bros understand, that an AI is way better at doing their job than it is at creating art.
minus-squareVilian@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agotech bros jobs is to wrote bad javascript and fall for scam, this AI already beaten
minus-squareFaceDeer@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up0·6 months agoSo you’re happy to see AI take someone else’s job as long as it isn’t taking your job.
minus-squaremindbleach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoLess work being done by anyone is better. Thinking it’s bad that work is done for us by robots is the brain worms talking.
minus-squareFaceDeer@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up0·6 months agoIndeed. Ideally AI would do every job, so that humans can focus on just doing what we want to do. It’d be like the whole species getting to retire.
minus-squaremindbleach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months ago You’d rather cheer for people to lose their jobs without anyone calling you out on it, sure. I’m not the angry one wishing unemployment on my “enemies” here. Who are you? What do you want?
minus-squareFaceDeer@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up0·6 months agoThe ideal endpoint is to eliminate the concept of “jobs” entirely. Why should people have to work?
minus-squaremindbleach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoOkay. So why are you breaking that guy’s balls, over automating away jobs, which you don’t want to exist?
minus-squareFaceDeer@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 months agoBecause currently we do need jobs. Otherwise why is he upset about AI in the first place?
I think approximation is the right word here. It’s pretty cool and all and I’m looking forward how it will develop. But it’s mostly a fun toy.
I’m stoked for the moment the tech bros understand, that an AI is way better at doing their job than it is at creating art.
tech bros jobs is to wrote bad javascript and fall for scam, this AI already beaten
So you’re happy to see AI take someone else’s job as long as it isn’t taking your job.
Less work being done by anyone is better. Thinking it’s bad that work is done for us by robots is the brain worms talking.
Indeed. Ideally AI would do every job, so that humans can focus on just doing what we want to do. It’d be like the whole species getting to retire.
Who are you?
What do you want?
The ideal endpoint is to eliminate the concept of “jobs” entirely. Why should people have to work?
Okay. So why are you breaking that guy’s balls, over automating away jobs, which you don’t want to exist?
Because currently we do need jobs. Otherwise why is he upset about AI in the first place?
Is he?