• BURN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    There’s never another bidder

    Michelin won’t do F1 because they don’t want to make artificially degrading tyres. Firestone is happy with Indycar afaik. Pirelli is really the only major option for F1.

  • dublet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Given the weird constraints of tyres in F1, I’m not sure how much value this partnership actually brings to Pirelli.

    • NotSpez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think it’s still a great advertisement having their name on every F1 car. Not only in races but also on every poster etc. And I guess many people think: hey if they can be trusted with f1, I can probably trust them too.

    • Whelks_chance@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think the message is “we know enough about tyres that we can make them behave exactly how the customer need them to”, regardless of how sensible those demands actually are.

        • Whelks_chance@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          True, but I blame the track for that one. Pirelli did the research and averted a pretty scary alternative to that race, where the kerbs ripped the rubber from the hubs at high speed.

    • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think it were a detriment to their sales and brand they’d pull out. I don’t think anyone sees the performance of F1 tyres and translates that to the performance of their road tyres.