• Shadowq8@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    is there a way to prove content manipulation on a website ? Isn’t reddit already super pro democrat… why is this fediverse and others being drowned in this bullshit ? Fuck them both biden and trump and us politicians, they are just puppets. The real masters are the corporations . I thought this website you would see more posts like reviving occupy wall street.

    But the corporations they got the money…

  • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    Full senile moment = “raspy voice”

    Biden apologists are gonna be the reason Trump gets elected.

  • Novman@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    As an european, what scares me , it is that Biden is the ACTUAL president. If he suffers from dementia, who is really in charge now. Who takes the decisions? Usa are involved in at least two major wars and dictate the policy to the europeans. Who is responsible of that? If biden cannot be a candidate , why it is an actual president?

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    RBG, Feinstein, now Biden. Selfish geriatric boomers should learn when to retire.

  • StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    This Biden protection is crazy. we need a candidate who actually stands a chance against Trump. this is insane. It’s 2016 all over again.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I have no faith in the future and only pray death is swift and merciful. I will vote Biden in hopes of delaying the inevitable another four years.

    I was hoping that the Right’s march into fascism was going to be the call to action that Americans needed to abandon them and push the country into being a proper developed nation…

    Instead, people go along with it to own the libs, and the privileged who know better have the resources to stamp their foot and wait for a savior they should know will never come.

  • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    We should all be screaming at the top of our lungs for Biden to drop out now. Fast. Throw in Newsom or Whitmer. I’ll vote for either, doesn’t matter.

    This is a no brainer, and no loss. Either they do it which would be great, or we’re stuck with biden anyway, who now looks to be much worse off against trump.

    Everyone should be telling biden to drop out. Everyone everyone everyone. And loudly.

    • Marcbmann@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      The people here are either delusional or trying to convince themselves they didn’t see a disaster of a debate.

      “So he didn’t somersault onto stage” That… That’s not the issue here

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Legitimately I can’t tell how much of it is self-delusion and how much is just blatant lying. Either way, these geriatric ghouls don’t deserve this level of mental gymnastics.

        Even liberal media like the NYT are admitting it, and we can all see him with our eyes, I don’t see what this sort of blatant denialism is supposed to accomplish other than demonstrating in-group loyalty.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t see what this sort of blatant denialism is supposed to accomplish other than demonstrating in-group loyalty.

          That loyalty is a goal in itself for people not knowing any better.

          For others it’s a way to make Trump win.

          What I don’t get is how RFK Jr is still seen as something worse than a senile man and a man with terminal stages of neurosyphilis. He just has brain damage and some overvalued ideas, very well known and clear. While these two are simply not functional.

          But then maybe it’s good I live in another part of the world.

        • wick@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I don’t think this would convince anyone, but Trump has shown that lying about every fucking thing can convince some people. Maybe a less dumb version of this meme could move the needle for someone who is on the fence and hasn’t watched the debate. (There are dozens of them out there)

          No idea why this was posted here though, or how so many people approve of it. It’s the dumbest shit I’ve ever seen. I guess there’s a lot more people on the platform who have legitimate Trump derangement syndrome and find this acceptable than I would’ve thought.

          • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            It is blue MAGAism. I’ve kept telling it people here for months and kept being shunend with the same ridiculous lines of argumentation. Either on Bidens health or for me more importantly on how supporting genocide is somehow a good and acceptable thing, because god forbid we demand and enforce a non genocide non neoliberal candidate.

            Which brings me to another point. Trump was on brand. Everything he said was more or less predictable. Meanwhile Biden trying to talk about social justice and tax justice was clearly not his tune. So not only did the campaign managers not manage to prepare him for Trump being Trump. They gave him stuff to talk about, he doesn’t talk about normally, making his performance even less believable.

            • PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              I don’t get what blue maga actually means. Does it get tossed both ways?

              And I get frustrated that peeps can agree with others like 95 percent of the time then get absolutely shit on for having a differing opinion. If I can make a chain from what you said to a bad outcome with logical fallacies you’re obvs a nazi.

              Yeah. Trump was Trump. I’ve never bothered watching his insanity so I don’t know if/how much he’s declining. But he’s a known quantity and not super interesting.

              • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Blue MAGA as in dogmatically following and defending the leader, while deflecting any valid criticism with extreme vitriol. I have been called a secret Trump advocate for saying that Biden is a genocide supporter and in declining mental health. Pointing out that the Dems could have propped up a better candidate and need to do that, was met with attacks.

                Saying that they are alienating minority voters was met with racist attacks against those minorities, claiming them to be dumb. Actually they willing to face much more threats than the white upper class liberal from a Trump presidency, but they have the backbone to say that genocide is a red line and they understand that if they accept one genocide the next one is coming, until they are the ones being genocided.

                Any notion that the Democrats are an establishment party that is playing with fire by continuing down their establishment road instead of working towards being a real progressive alternative that most people would love to vote for, was shunned.

                It is political delusionalism, fueled by gas lighting from the DNC cabal. Instead of motivating their base, instead of providing a vision and inspiration they chose to gaslight, shame and threat their base into submission. That is how you build a cult and that is how you destroy any progressive political movement. Because then all people are left with is fear of loosing out, which is easily exploited by fascists like Trump.

                • PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  They did the same shit with Hilary. Just memory holed anything negative.

                  Because then all people are left with is fear of loosing out, which is easily exploited by fascists like Trump.

                  We need electoral reform that removes as much strategic voting as possible.

    • nexguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Alternative is 4 years of more maga federal judges causing multiple generations of damage. It doesn’t matter at all about Bidens health. He has advisors. He has a vice president. No one would be filling federal benches in sewage. That it all that matters.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        What does that have to do with anything? Did you reply to the wrong comment?

    • Lad@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Debates are little more than performances and Joe completely shit the bed.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    187
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    I am not going to vote for Joe Biden. I am going to vote for the Biden Administration. They can “Weekend at Bernie’s” the old man for all I care.

    • RatzChatsubo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Sounds like a great strategy… smh

      Might as well give Trump the presidency on a silver platter

    • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Biden could drop dead on January 21st and we’ll still get to call this mission accomplished, VP Jeffries ain’t a half bad outcome personally, although Kamala having her eyes on that incumbent effect is gonna make me groan come 28

      • crusa187@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Jeffries is literally one of the most corrupt neolibs in Congress in terms of taking bribe money.

    • psmgx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 days ago

      That’s been the standard US Presidential SOP since Nixon developed a serious drinking problem and Kissinger demanded all orders go through him first (so as to avoid WW3).

      They had an old, dementia ridden actor, and the dumb-ass Bush son for that reason, too. HW Bush could handle his shit but he raised taxes and puked on the Japanese PM so that’s a pass. Trump is just another stooge to be kept in line so that his doners get what they want.

  • Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    247
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I don’t like Joe Biden, I’ll never forget the Neoliberal bullshit he did with the Republicans in the 90s we are still suffering from further eviscerating the safetynet to the draconian war on people suffering addiction. He’s one of the OG former opposition party members the Reagan Revolution convinced to take the bigger bribe checks from Wall Street than Unions could ever match, today’s neoliberal(D) party.

    That said, I voted for him in the last election, and I will again out of harm reduction. He has improved on policy, but l even if he didn’t, the American people do not get a vote on whether or not to elect a senile President this cycle.

    You can have any President you like, as long as he’s senile. If you vote, we’ll get a senile President. If you don’t, we’ll get a senile President.

    The question is whether you want senile and gleefully cruel®, or just senile(D). I’ll take just senile.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      the American people do not get a vote on whether or not to elect a senile President this cycle

      I feel like I’ve somehow become trapped in some kind of simulation or thought experiment where the purpose of it is to make lesser evilism seem as ridiculous as conceivably possible, and every time I think it’s peaked with just comical levels of absurdity, it somehow manages to escalate.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Except you do get to vote for no senility. That is what the primaries were for. Trump was actually struggling quite a bit against a young woman.

      As was Biden for a hot second against a younger candidate. That was short lived. Biden was also getting a bit of a slap by a few people who were not on board for having Biden run the party again.

      This is why you don’t sleep through the primaries and complain you only get the only one vote on parties.

    • index@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      3 days ago

      You can have any President you like, as long as he’s senile. If you vote, we’ll get a senile President. If you don’t, we’ll get a senile President.

      there are other candidates you can vote for

      • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        You’re still going to get a senile president.

        Harm reduction dictates voting for the least harmful outcome, period.

            • RyeBread@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              The same reality that thinking voting for Biden in a rural deep conservative state is going to swing the vote. You can convince every person in the cities to vote democratic and still lose to the country side that state. Voting doesn’t work the same for every state, don’t shame people for voting their conscious. It’s always okay to shame voting for Trump, but don’t shame people for voting third party.

              • papertowels@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Afaik, that’s simply not true. Take a look at the margins that Biden won by in 2020 in a few key states.

                You’ll notice that the third party votes could’ve easily swung the state outcome either way.

                Finally, you’ll notice how far behind third party votes are. The conclusion I’m drawing is that the possibility of third party votes influencing the outcome between the two candidates is greater than the possibility of a third party candidate winning.

                • RyeBread@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I think we both agree that there are locations and states where it does truly matter. I think where I’d disagree is that it’s not applicable for every state. Sometimes it’s already decided on where you live. It’s better not to shame third party voters in situations like that. The only way to get a third party one day is by starting in locations like that. Though coming from a situation like that, I also understand it’s a less stressful election than one that you have a chance of winning. Just not worth shaming others who don’t have the option of winning and vote third party for president for their conscious. Still voting blue for everything else though.

    • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      160
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Or vote third-party, and you’ll probably get a senile President, but maybe not.

      And more importantly, you’re helping to break the Duopoly and normalize voting third-party.

      If a minor party manages to get 5% of the vote, they qualify for federal funding in the next election, and that might lead to real change.

      Cornel West is polling at about 3% (and after Biden’s performance, I wouldn’t be surprised if Cornel picks up a couple more percent). We could be close.

      Edit: Or just keep on thinking you have to settle for the lesser of two evils. (How’s that working out for you?)

      • Wilzax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        78
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        If you’re in a state that will certainly be blue or red and has 0% chance of swinging unless a huge proportion of the population changes their party affiliation (California, New York, Mississippi, Alabama, to name a few) then vote 3rd party, sure.

        If your state was within 10% of flipping colors in any of the past 3 presidential elections, DO NOT vote 3rd party. Your vote matters too much to risk it.

        • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          26
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Yeah, that’s the conventional wisdom. When Ross Perot ran, most of his support came from states that weren’t swing states.

          (Despite often being called a “spoiler”, he probably had little impact on the result of the election because of that.)

          But! Later polls showed that 35% of voters would have voted for Perot if they thought he could win. And if all those people had voted for Perot, he would have won!

          Just something to think about.

          • Wilzax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            If we could somehow ensure that our actual desires were reflected by our votes without simultaneously risking our vote being wasted by splitting support between similar candidates, we could have actual representative democracy. But we all have a duty to prevent the worst to the best of our ability, even at the sacrifice of our support of what we think would be best, but unlikely.

            Vote for ranked choice voting however you can. This paradox is intentional design, not an unforeseen consequence. We need to rework the voting system before things have any chance to get better without violent revolution.

            • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              3 days ago

              It’s actually been mathematically proven that ranked-choice voting does not eliminate the so-called spoiler effect. It’s called Arrow’s Impossibity Theorem.

              As people who live in a country with FPTP voting, we’re all intimately familiar with the drawbacks of FPTP voting. But all voting systems have their drawbacks.

              (I’ve actually been a volunteer election worker in a country with ranked ballots and proportional representation, and the experience actually soured me on ranked ballots and proportional representation.)

              Countries like Canada and the UK manage to have four or five parties with FPTP voting.

              Stop waiting for the perfect voting system, because there is no perfect system.

              • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 days ago

                Countries like Canada and the UK manage to have four or five parties with FPTP voting.

                And they both are dominated by 2 parties. Hardly a defense of FPTP.

                Stop waiting for the perfect voting system, because there is no perfect system.

                There may be no perfect system, but there are certainly systems that utterly fail to capture the will of the people, and FPTP (especially the US’s implementation of it) is one such system. People aren’t going to magically all change their centuries long behavior of voting for 1 of two parties. This is a systematic problem, and the solution is election reform.

                • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  And they both are dominated by 2 parties. Hardly a defense of FPTP.

                  Justin Trudeau’s current government is a minority government being propped up by a minor party (the NDP). That minor party were able to get the government to pass a Pharmacare bill in exchange for their support.

                  With just 24 seats in parliament, the NDP were able to deliver on an election promise to their voters. I’d say that’s pretty good.

              • slickgoat@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                I disagree. I too have been involved in elections in my country (Australia) and preferential voting system is pretty popular. As candidates get eliminated your vote keeps moving to your next choice. What could possibly be fairer?

                • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  What could possibly be fairer?

                  Approval or STAR voting, since they are more heavily utilized by all citizens instead of just white people, they are purely additive unlike ranked, which allows for easy auditing and making sharing the results possible in real time.

                  They’re also far easier to explain, which makes voting more inclusive, and the results more straightforward to follow.

                  RCV is definitely better than what we have now, but if we’re gonna have election reform we should go for the best possible system, not a half measure like RCV.

                • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  And yet minor parties fair pretty poorly in Australian elections, and always have. Minor parties currently have 6 seats in Australia’s House of Representatives (up from 3 in the previous parliament).

                  In Canada, third-parties (Greens, Bloc Quebecois, and NDP) have 56 seats between them.

                  In the UK, there are 11 third-parties represented in the House of Commons, with 84 seats between them.

          • yyyesss?@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            and he still would have lost. he got nearly 20% of the popular vote and exactly 0 electoral votes. until we change the system, they cannot win. sorry. please vote against fascism

                • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Yes, but he would have won if everyone had voted how their heart desired.

                  Both major parties want you to believe that voting third-party is “throwing your vote away”, but it isn’t true. Simply expressing your heart’s desire and having it counted on the public record makes voting worthwhile, even if your candidate doesn’t win. (And in the case of Ross Perot, he would have won.)

                  You might as well say that voting for anyone except the candidate who is leading in the polls is throwing your vote away if that’s how you see it.

                  A woman from a formerly Communist Eastern European country once told me a story. After their country had democratized, there was an election held on the day of a horrible blizzard. Her mother and father wanted to vote for one candidate, and her brother and sister wanted to vote for the rival candidate.

                  “Why don’t we all just stay home, since our votes will cancel each other out anyway”, someone said. And so her mother and sister decided to stay home. But her father and brother went out into the blizzard to vote, knowing that their votes would cancel each other out.

                  They just wanted to participate in democracy. They wanted to express themselves and be counted, even if it didn’t change anything.

      • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Or vote third-party, and you’ll probably get a senile President, but maybe not.

        Vote third party and we are guaranteed to get a senile president. It’s a two party FPTP system.

        Edit: Or just keep on thinking you have to settle for the lesser of two evils. (How’s that working out for you?)

        Better than telling people to throw away their vote. How’s that working for you? How many 3rd party presidents have you gotten elected with your strategy? How many fascist policies has your strategy avoided us?

        • Hyphlosion@donphan.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I’ve long fantasized of people being so fed up with both parties, that along would come a third party at the right time and enough people would flock to them that and vote them into office.

          But it’s just that: A fantasy.

          And anyways, there’s always the chance that said third party would be way way worse and maybe there’s a good reason why they weren’t more prominent to begin with.

              • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Not necessarily. The MAGA crowd took over the GOP. The same could be done for the DNC, but with actual leftists and election reformists.

                • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  There are several reasons why the MAGA crowd were allowed to take over the GOP. First, because they weren’t pushovers, if the party had tried shenanigans to stop them there was a real possibility of people defecting from the party en masse, and even of violence at the convention. Second, because the things they wanted weren’t really all that contrary to what the rich donors wanted.

                  The Democratic base is much more weak willed and willing to go along with whatever to stop the right. We don’t have enough of that Karen energy, that “my way or the highway” attitude. And election reform is directly contrary to the interests of the establishment, and the aim of prioritizing ordinary people over the rich goes against the interests of the doners. They’ll crush any internal movement in that direction, and people will still vote for them because of “vote blue no matter who” and lesser evilist ideology.

      • PunnyName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Once First Past the Post voting is gone, and ranked choice is in, third party will be viable.

        But right now, that’s not the reality we live in.

          • AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            Well it’s certainly not going to happen if you ignore the realities of first past the post voting systems, vote third party, and let the party that depends on tactics to subvert democratic will win an election they shouldn’t have. Do that, and you may just not get to vote at all anymore.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Well it’s certainly not going to happen if you ignore the realities of first past the post voting systems,

              If you’ve got a large popular mandate that reliably shows support for a policy (say, a large plurality willing to change FPTP to STB or Approval voting or whatever) then you can affect the change.

              But even more than FPTP, we have a supermajority mandate to make changes to the electoral system on that scale.

              Easier to win 50%+1 on an issue of policy than 67% on an issue of electoral function.

              Do that, and you may just not get to vote at all anymore.

              Civil Rights and Women’s Lib had to be achieved outside the electoral system, because these groups were deliberately disenfranchised.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Build a platform by building consensus, not pitching a longshot

        Vote for all down ticket races and help get blue policy makers in every seat possible.

      • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        If every single person on Lemmy voted third-party I guarantee you they wouldn’t carry a single state. In a two party dominated FPTP/winner takes all system voting third-party for president is irresponsible

          • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Most of these people can’t be reasoned with. We’re at the point where there’s no excuses for them not to vote to keep Trump from taking over.

            The gloves are off.

            • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Okay, but swinging at third party people does nothing to sway them, tends to do the opposite, and tires you out. It’s like punching your own dick instead of your opponent in a boxing match.

              • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                3 days ago

                They’re not third party. I’ll all but guarantee it. They’re just trying to ensure no one votes for Biden.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        He said, with no examples or evidence of any kind.

        Edit the way "vote’ is used in that sentence isn’t so much a ballot transaction…it’s more a “choice”.

        Biden or trump WILL be the next president.

        This sucks but cannot be avoided.

        Edit edit choose left right or abstain, it’s all the same. A senile president will be the next president

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Biden or trump WILL be the next president.

          Both are over the mean life expectancy, neither is in particularly great health, and it’s another six months until the inauguration.

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            Sure. But the chances of both of them croaking in the next 6 months are very low.

            Biden has the whole US government at his back, highly trained and motivated to not let the sitting US president die.

            Trump, well, terrible bastards seem to never die.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              But the chances of both of them croaking in the next 6 months are very low.

              The way Biden looked with a simple cough? And with the physical burden a continuous high stakes campaign puts on a candidate?

              Wouldn’t even be the first time a President campaigned himself into an early grave. Harrison, Taylor, Harding, and FDR all leap to mind.

              Biden has the whole US government at his back, highly trained and motivated to not let the sitting US president die.

              All the SS agents in the world can’t save you from COVID

          • Furbag@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            If you’re counting on one of them dying before the election, keep dreaming. FFS, Trump might very well run while incarcerated and it probably won’t dissuade anyone who is already committed for him.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Trump might very well run while incarcerated

              I’d put more money on one of them dying than seeing the inside of a prison cell. The judge in the Trump trial explicitly stated that he did not want to put a sitting president in prison.

              • Furbag@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Trump isn’t a sitting president yet, he’s still a former president.

                Judge Merchan said that before the guilty verdict, when Trump violated his gag order 10 times consecutively. His next words after “I don’t want to put you in jail” were “…but I will if you continue to jeopardize the judicial process.” (paraphrasing). Obviously, the judge did not want to resort to jail for criminal contempt because the case had a lot of eyes on it and jumping to jail before issuing warnings and fines gives the impression of impropriety or bias, which could have been grounds for a mistrial had he taken Trump’s bait.

                Most people think he’s going to walk on the basis that he has no prior criminal convictions and that he’s the presumptive Republican nominee, but there’s also the fact that he’s shown no remorse for his crimes even after the verdict and that allowing him to escape a prison term with a slap on the wrist house arrest or a fine will not realistically deter him or others from committing the same crime.

                I’d say it’s still a good possibility that he sees jail. Probably not for the max 3 year sentence, but some token amount of incarceration would be appropriate. He’ll likely be out before taking office should he actually win, and they’ll probably make special provisions for him to continue campaigning, so he probably won’t even spend that much time in an actual cell.

                The real kicker is his next conviction will mean he has to contend with a criminal history, which will vastly increase his chances of receiving actual prison time. That all hinges on him not getting elected and pardoning himself for all the federal crimes he’s accused of, the most severe of which being his role in the J6 insurrection and the classified documents case which could easily land him in prison for the rest of his life.

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  His next words after “I don’t want to put you in jail” were “…but I will if you continue to jeopardize the judicial process.”

                  After the tenth contempt citation.

                  Most people think he’s going to walk on the basis that he has no prior criminal convictions and that he’s the presumptive Republican nominee, but there’s also the fact that he’s shown no remorse for his crimes even after the verdict and that allowing him to escape a prison term with a slap on the wrist house arrest or a fine will not realistically deter him or others from committing the same crime.

                  I doubt he’ll make this particular mistake another time, mostly because he’s got too much media scrutiny to still run around with high end call girls.

                  But when it comes to the actual governance? He’s not going to get punished for that.

                  I’d say it’s still a good possibility that he sees jail

                  I would not put any amount of money on it.

                  The real kicker is his next conviction will mean he has to contend with a criminal history

                  All the rest of the cases are either dropped or delayed until after the election. Either way, there’s not going to be a “next conviction” before it no longer matters.

          • Soup@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I love how you accuse someone of being wrong- then go on to say a bunch of unproven opinionated nonsense. It’s almost as if you don’t really know what you’re talking about.

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Lol

            Edit if you think the dnc is going to flexibly react to new information, and bring up a non establishment candidate, at this part of the game, well, you do you.

            You seemingly need to hurl insults to disagree with people. Thats pretty lame. Disagree with my position all you like, that’s fine. But acting out isn’t helping your position.

            So yeah, let’s chat again later on. I personally don’t think it’ll be anyone but trump or Biden.

            Edit edit still no examples or evidence. When you’re suggesting things other than the norm/the status quo are gonna happen, you need to show up with more than a wall of text and a lot of sass lol

          • papertowels@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            I need a remindme bot for a year out, lol.

            I feel like you’re technically right that there is a (highly improbable) chance it will not be between Biden or trump, but it’s not something I’d lean on this hard, haha.

      • Resonosity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s up to the DNC as to which candidate takes the running ballot. I’m betting there are a lot of conversations right now about who will be that person.

        You are half right and half wrong because that decision will come down to whether establishment Democrats or populist Democrats win.

        And to be quiet frank, I don’t even think the DNC gets a say. Since Biden is the incumbent, unless he bows out voluntarily, I don’t think we the people or the DNC get to choose.

        Our hands are really tied when it comes to the presidential frontrunner, unfortunately.

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s always telling when some one insists that a statement is true when they themselves know that it isn’t.

          It’s 💯 the case the Biden isn’t the nominee today. I’m not arguing if it’s going to be a progressive or a insider that replaces him. Frankly, I could give a shit because either will be doing instantly better than Biden.

          Biden is replaceable and there is a cult of personality that has developed that believes this isn’t the case. They’re wrong. There as delusional as the right wing MAGA crowd and their doing MAGAs work for them as the useful idiots that they are.

          It’s important to keep it clear that I’m not arguing that some how magically were going to replace Biden with a progressive. I’m arguing that needs to, and will be, replaced. That’s what Thursday showed us, and I know for a fact that the Beltway heard this.

          The party that needs to be convinced is Harris. And I think she can be. All of these machinations are happening this weekend, as we speak.

          My called shot: Biden steps down as early as Monday, as late as two weeks from Monday. I’m going to be making some calls and seeing what tea I can find spilled.

          • Resonosity@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I never refuted your claim in certainty, rebutting with my own truth statements. In my comment, I pointed to the variables in effect leading to whether Biden stays in the race or bows out. Realistically, it’s uncertain at this moment.

            I will say that if and once donors dry up, I do think that the DNC will take action. What action that is will depend.

            It’s going to be an exciting few days/weeks.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    most important thing is that he can still use his arm to sign legislation. that’s all you need him for. the actual deal is the cabinet. that’s what you’re voting for.

    too bad most people don’t think about that, and fuck the dnc for putting the country in this situation.

    • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is a terrible sentiment. You need a team and you need someone to lead that team. Having the leader just be a puppet is terrible.

      You’ll get a dysfunctional cabinet this way, you will get grifting, taking advantage of the puppet showing his face to bad ideas and you will get foreign influence prying on the weak puppet president.

      And even if the president is not a puppet and “only weak”. We have a government falling apart and in deadlock because of our chancellor being a weak leader in Germany. The only thing holding them together at this point is the fear of them losing power sooner in an early election. All it does is give even further rise to the fascists.

      You need a competent leader at the head of the cabinet. And that starts with her or him having their mental capacity.

      • VoterFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Biden has been president for almost 4 years and we haven’t seen any of those things. That’s how I know all this FUD is overblown. The things you are describing were rampant under Trump, not Biden.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        oh you’re right. voting for biden may give rise to fascists… so we should let the actual fascists win instead. how have i never thought of this before‽

        • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          You let the Democrats gaslighting work on you. Since half a year they make us think, that the only two options are Trump and Biden, when in fact they could have allowed for proper primaries. They could have worked to prop up other candidates as viable alternatives. But they wanted the puppet they can control.

          It is not too late to acknowledge Biden to be unfit and put up a different candidate. I have been advocating for this here since months. But instead of acknowledging that there is more real options, the DNC propaganda worked and works hard to limit our thinking to “its either one of them, no looking past the fishbowl”.

          Biden was never voted because he was Biden. He was voted because he wasn’t Trump. Any halfway decent candidate that does not shares Bidens dogmatic support for genocide in Gaza and abusing immigrants can fill this role a hundred times better. Any such candidate could win the election in a landslide.

          Pull the emergency brake on the Biden train. The Biden train is going into the abyss.

          • pyre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            just tell us who you think people should vote for, instead of weaseling around it.

            • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              People should force the DNC to make primaries and have the people decide on a candidate.

                • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Then you vote third party and take the fight to the streets because you do not accept two genocidal mass murderers as legitimate options

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      …primaries where you get vote among these candidates. There were options.

  • Weirdfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    So the man has a stutter, and he’s old, what ever. All I can do is cast my single vote. Last time, I voted against Trump, and honestly, even after the debate, I’ll cast my vote this time for Biden.

    I’d much rather cast my vote for Hakeem Jeffries, or Shift, or Bernie, or a dozen other people who aren’t an option.

    Thing is, I’m going to cast my vote in Cook county IL, so it literally won’t matter. IL is going blue no matter what, and I feel like my participation is merely token.

    I wish I could do more, I want to scream at clouds about what is happening to the country, and it doesn’t matter.

    Saw a stat that says Trump is 65% to win, and want to physically grab people and shake them, but what would it matter?

    Had I walked into that debate blind, not knowing who those people are, what the “facts” and the facts are, I’d have thought, that Biden guy seems weak and befuddled, and boy that Trump is sure a confident leader. It made me feel sick.

    As I told my mother today, I don’t have kids, I live in the midwest, have a good job with a big stable company, truth is, even a second Trump term won’t effect me that much. I can just sit back, enjoy my 30 so years left, and watch the world burn, but damn it, I have empathy for others, and there are many, many people whose lives and livelihood are going to be seriously impacted, and that bothers me.

    • yrmp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ll also be casting my vote in Cook county. I have hispanic kids. My wife is Salvadoran. She is a US citizen born and raised in the US. I’m a white atheist and a dual citizen of the EU who has had the audacity to previously speak poorly about my corporate overlords. I grew up in the south. I don’t trust these project 2025 fucks to stop at illegal immigrants. Biden sucks, but I’ll vote for him anyway because the system literally gives me no other option. Until the system changes or fails, this is what we must do.

      If you value the supreme court, lower court appointments, social security, healthcare, childcare, the environment, action on climate change, a competent CDC for the pandemics we’re going to experience more frequently, etc., vote Biden. Yes he’s old. Yes he sucks. Unfortunately he’s the lesser of two evils. And by a wide margin.

      • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        If your district is definitely going blue then you could safely vote 3rd party… Think of it as a vote to change the fptp system. There is no way the system will ever change if we don’t start forcing it to.

  • eran_morad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    130
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Biden shit the bed and should fuck off. But I’d vote for his corpse over any filthy republican traitor.

    • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 days ago

      Both candidates would be more attractive to me if they died actually lol I wish we had the option to just skip having a president for 4 years haha

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Dunno if it’s interesting to you, but communists in Russia often say that it can only get democratic again when the “against all” variant is returned to ballots (CPRF is usually not considered something genuine).

        • yrmp@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          Because our electoral system was created 200+ years ago and hasn’t had a major overhaul since.

        • Hackworth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          At least as pretense, the primaries are meant to prevent the need for that. And we like to pretend a third party could be successful if the other two are sufficiently incompetent/corrupt. In practice, the lawmakers will never implement a process that gives any amount of their power to the people. There was a window of time in the 90’s - 00’s where we thought the future might hold something other than the cyberpunk dystopia we all see coming. Now I’m reduced to just trying to enjoy the last vestiges of the middle class before it’s gone. Umm, but yeah, we should be able to vote no confidence.

        • Dkarma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Jesus fucking Christ I hate that I can’t tell if ur from the us or not cuz our constituency is so fucking dumb

  • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    He needs to withdraw. He has to. The man looks like he’s dying. It’s time to stop playing pretend. This is fucking stupid. He’s literally not physically capable of being president. He doesn’t just have a raspy voice, he rambles incoherently, he can barely seem to register what’s going on at any moment. He nods off in public. He’s ancient. He should be no where near a political office.

    If he runs he’s handing Trump the presidency. And I don’t even fully believe he cares. If he cared he would never have run in the first place. He also chose to hammer home on his unending support for Israeli colonialism and crimes against humanity. Just to further aleniate the progressives and moderates who want him to stand up for human rights.

    I have no faith in him to drive a car let alone handle the political office of the presidency. He could be a literal corpse and he’d still get my vote over Trump. But you’re asking people to vote for someone who is openly incapable of doing the job he’s campaigning for. He HAS to step down. He CANNOT defeat fascism. He is not capable of it and he is so chronically neoliberal that he cannot even create a strong opposition to fascism.

    We’re all freaking the fuck out because this is the worst scenario. The one we ALL SAID WAS COMING. We were all told not to talk about how old he is Trump is old too and all that. And Trump absolutely is old but he’s a fascist for one and fascists vote differently than anyone else does. But much worse he always rambles incoherently so standing next to Joe he looked as he normally does and Biden was the one who had visibly aged.

    Enough is enough is enough he has to go. Where is the real political effort to have him withdraw. The clock is ticking until November and he HAS TO GO.

  • Mastengwe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s good to see common sense in here. While Biden did not make a good show- the fact remains that he is up against a convicted felon and a fascist traitor to his country.

    I’m glad to see reason in most of the responses.