• Kelly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Is a crappy situation but patents don’t enable the patent holder to make a product, after all you can make the product without claiming a patent. Instead they stop people who are not the patent holder from making that product.

    So if we put on our tinfoil hats its likely that some “just in case” patents are really just stopping their competition from heading in that direction.

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Their lack of a patent for controller vibration prevented Sony from having vibration on Sixaxis - notice that despite all the BS that it interfered with motion sensing, Dualshock 3 came out just a few months after Sony managed to settle the suite with Immersion.

      Since there’s no penalty for making a patent and not using it, it’s probably cheaper for Sony to pre-emptively register everything that comes from brainstorming sessions.

      • Kelly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        45 minutes ago

        A great example, immersion held a patent and blocked the competition.

        However if Sony (or anyone else) had developed and released a product (or even published a design) using the same technical implementation before 1996 then that would have established prior art and no one would be able to patent it.