• wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Scientists do not question the concept of science. They challenge results of tests by performing new ones to replicate the proposed results.

    I think maybe you need to retake some high school classes

    • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Scientists do not question the concept of science

      Questioning the validity of science is precisely how science is done These are 2 different statements, pertaining to 2 different actions.

      Both the statements are true… err… alright, maybe not the first one as much. You can question the concept of science (which, in a way, boils down to “Question everything”) and still be a scientist.

      Questioning the validity of (other’s and your own previous) science is a part of the concept of science.

      Questioning the concept of science is more of a philosophical matter and would be valid in a quest for better concepts.

      The above two statements are not actually denying each other.

    • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      9 months ago

      No, and neither do people who question the results, which is, in fact, what most “anti-science” people do.

      Skepticism is part of the scientific method. Blind faith is not.

      • Facebones@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Hate to break it to you sunshine, going “nuh uh” at any science you don’t like cause it clashes with your world view you gained from religion or your Bigoted daddy?

        That’s called blind faith.

        • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          9 months ago

          Thanks for your opinion but I didn’t deny any science, all I said is I don’t fault people for questioning it.

          Also, your insults are unnecessary and childish and don’t really help your argument. I’ve argued my case respectfully and without name-calling, and I suggest you do the same.

          • Facebones@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            “I don’t have an argument so I’m going to deflect by saying I’M not a science denier I just spend my time defending science deniers. Also anyone who disagrees with me is a childish meanie 😭”

            • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              9 months ago

              “I don’t have an argument so I’m just gonna pretend you said something you didn’t and argue with that.”

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        There are a number of easy classes you can take online, where you will learn about neat things like “the water cycle” and “why is the sky blue?”

        Try hard enough and you might even get a gold star from the teacher

      • saintshenanigans@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Skepticism is the literal precursor to the scientific method, and that’s where you’re stopping. There is no science at the skepticism step.

        You’re basically saying, “Gravity isn’t real because I don’t see proof.”

        A real scientist would drop an apple, a feather, a bowling ball, and verify it.

        • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Skepticism is the literal precursor to the acientific method, and that’s where you’re stopping.

          Good, so we agree on something then. No skepticism = no science.

          You’re basically saying, “Gravity isn’t real because I don’t see proof.”

          Strawman. I didn’t say that.

          A real scientist would drop an apple, a feather, a bowling ball, and verify it.

          Yes, and some of the people in the “anti-science” community ARE doing that. And the rest of them are conducting a self-experiment on what happens if you ignore all the science…