"Protesters who wear masks could face arrest, up to a month in jail and a £1,000 fine under proposed measures that human rights campaigners claim are pandering to “culture war nonsense”.

Police in England and Wales will be given the power to arrest people if they are wearing face coverings at specific demonstrations, the Home Office has said."

Been a bad 18 months or so for privacy in the UK. Online Safety Bill passed, the right to take strike action curtailed, people in receipt of benefits (including disabled people) will soon (as from 2025) have their bank accounts open to the government, the right to protest curtailed and now this.

  • li10@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    ·
    5 months ago

    I see no hope for this country. Things are just getting worse and worse every year, how long can this keep going?

    It’s pretty bad now, but I seriously worry what things will be like in 20 or so years.

    • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 months ago

      Tories on a any% speed run to the government from Children of Men, while the left is worried about which way Kier decides to lean that afternoon

    • soviettaters@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      People hate on the US all the time, but the first amendment is very unique when you consider how other countries are curtailing people’s right to protest, practice their religion, etc.

      • Leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        An argument that might carry weight if you weren’t setting up hotlines for people to snitch on anything or anyone vaguely LGBTQIA+, removing books from libraries, allowing huge orgs to buy political favour, enslaving people in for-profit prison systems etc etc etc.

        • soviettaters@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          5 months ago
          1. Kids shouldn’t be coerced into being gay.
          2. Yeah lobbying sucks I agree
          3. If people don’t want to have to work in prison then they shouldn’t commit crimes.
          • irmoz@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Kids aren’t being “coerced into being gay”. That’s a batshit statement right there.

            Also, slavery is always bad. End of story. Putting any leeway in there is disgusting.

          • Restaldt@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Kids are not coerced in to being gay any more than geese are

            Lobbying sucks

            We are just ignoring the litany of false accusation and arrests of innocent people forced into modern legal slave labor?

            Better hope you never piss off the wrong cop or can afford a good personally retained lawyer if you do

      • spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        lol you Americans thinking your little piece of paper written centuries ago makes you better than other countries is cute.

        Your country is not the beacon of freedom you pretend it is.

      • li10@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        Pretty good if actually mattered.

        It’s a talking point that’s only upheld on political whim, which defeats the entire purpose of it.

  • ryan213@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    5 months ago

    Hmm…I wonder which political spectrum the current government belongs to…

        • DessertStorms@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Exactly… (leaving both firmly on the right)

          Vote none, and start organising (in your work place, in your community, in your own home inspiring your kids). If you still can’t see that the system is designed by the rich and powerful for the rich and powerful, you’re not paying any real attention (precisely why the media keeps society constantly looking at anything but how things are really run).

          We need to abolish the establishments keeping us down, not continue to play their game by their rules and wonder why things never change…

          • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            I hate kier but not voting for Labour would be stupid, protest votes or non votes don’t count any the only people pushing that idiocy are the rich right wing because they don’t want you to vote against them

            Everyone just thinks ‘oh look these people are too dumb, busy, or disconnected to vote oh well’

            You can still resist and work against a system you voted for,

          • mayooooo@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            You can vote as left as you can and still do whatever you are saying to do. Having ultraright nazi shits in power because you’re an internet idiot will not help you - in fact it will completely rob you of the chance to ever change anything. You dumb fucks will solve the world by not fucking voting, even if the game is rigged you don’t have to be the dumbest shit about it

            • DessertStorms@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Tell me you didn’t click the link without saying you didn’t click the link (hint: it literally tells people to vote).
              Also tell me you buy in to the distraction propaganda without saying you buy in to the distraction propaganda (hint: having a red tie on while not opposing a single piece of fascist legislation makes you, at the very least, a fascist enabler, or in reality, simply another fascist just one who is better at hiding it)…

              You’re literally giving a live demonstration of why continuing to play within their rules leads nowhere but deepening the divide within the working class.

              Blaming the people trapped in it, for the system keeping us all down, instead of those who created and benefit from it is one hell of a self destructive trick you’re doing for your overlords…

              Either way, you’re an ableist piece of crap, licking a boot because you’ve simply grown too comfortable with the feeling of it rammed down your throat, you have no high ground here. ¯\(ツ)

              • mayooooo@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                I’m not talking about the article, it’s about saying no. If I need to read the article that says yes when your link says no… I’m just sick of the onslaught of defetism online where a whole bunch of people have the idea they can just ignore reality and it’s all gona fix itself. But who cares right, will all be dead because of the climate wars so it’s all cool

    • Kaboom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      5 months ago

      Whatever gets them votes. Actual conservatives would at least pretend to care about the economy.

      • admiralteal@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Why? Conservatism is about preserving traditional values and traditional power structures not the economy.

        If you actually care about the economy that means you care about progressing a more effective and efficient state for the benefit of the people. Afraid that makes you a progressive which the conservatives assure us they aren’t.

        • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Conservatism is about preserving the status quo. (As opposed to reactionaries that want to restore the status quo ante)

          • njm1314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Not necessarily the current status quo though. Just the status quo where they have the most power.

          • n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Kaboom - Well if they were conservative and cared about traditional values, they wouldnt have let in so many migrants.

            Yes Immigrants are the problem /s

        • Kaboom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          5 months ago

          Well if they were conservative and cared about traditional values, they wouldnt have let in so many migrants.

          • LookBehindYouNowAndThen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            What “traditional values” are you talking about?

            We’re a nation of migrants; you don’t get to rewrite history because it makes you mad.

            The first immigration law passed in this country was a process for naturalization; it doesn’t get more traditional than that.

  • illi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    So if someone doesn’t want to get sick for being in a huge crowd, they get arrested? Truly genius.

  • z00s@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    5 months ago

    Remember remember the fifth of November,

    When Guy Fawks took the fall.

    Be sure to wear your mask from now on,

    They can’t arrest us all

    • DessertStorms@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Was just setting up my viewing for the rest of the evening, and ironically enough, it’s on tonight! 9pm on Quest (and again on Quest +1) .

      So at 9 I’ll be watching the last episode of Miners’ Strike 1984: The Battle for Britain, then V for Vendetta at 10… Good inspirational viewing.

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Fake beards, wigs , sunglasses and presumably face paint should be ok

    Stay safe protestors. Leave id and phone at home, don’t hold anything that could be interpreted as a weapon, and carry a “your rights” card to help you remember what to do if the police try to take away your freedom.

  • Dran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s like they think V for Vendetta was a blueprint for how to run a utopia.

  • DessertStorms@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think it’s important to relate the latter part to the former - beyond the privacy issues with not being allowed to wear masks (and having our bank accounts invaded), there is also the health aspect, and disallowing masks is one sure fire way to keep disabled people from assembling, since, you know, we don’t want to get covid, being significantly more likely to die from it (not necessarily because of the illness, but because our lives are deemed less worth saving).

    The lack of any mask mandates already excludes disabled people from so many public spaces, this is just another way to keep us (as well as others, you know, first they came for…) from fighting back. as they strip us of every last human right.

    • skydivekingair@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not comparing, we have our own issues, but the US just said not wearing a mask in public is akin to not paying taxes or speeding - it’s still illegal and not free speech because it affects others.

  • lemmyreader@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Is the UK turning into a dictatorship or an undeveloped country ? How is independent press doing over there ?

    • rmuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 months ago

      dictatorship or an undeveloped country

      Right-Wing Government: why not both?

    • Leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      More like fascist-adjacent. And we started the process of underdeveloping ourselves when the fascist-adjacent leaders persuaded the terminally ignorant that Brexit would be great when it was obvious it was going to lead exactly where it is leading right now.

  • erranto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I have never seen a cucked nation like the UK in the world before. u guys have no resistance what so ever ! the french should have bought you some freedoms a few centuries ago.

    • Leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s not even that - the people this is directly affecting (for now) are the people who, if they raise their head above the parapet, it’ll get shot off - the people least able to protest. 95% of the country are not lacking resistance, they’re lacking empathy and foresight. They show plenty of resistance to media driven culture war bullshit like immigration and LGBTQIA+ issues.

    • Leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      You’ve got to understand the ‘average’ British psyche at this point in history. The majority simply don’t care that people they see as troublemakers and/or scroungers are having their rights dismantled. They lack the empathy to give a shit for these people and they lack the foresight to see that it’ll be their rights gone one day too. What stirs the average british gammon off their collective arses these days is the rumour there might be an immigrant in a hotel somewhere or that a drag queen exists.

      • TengoDosVacas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        You described all of the western world since the passing of the US’s 1996 Telecommunications Act which gave all the radical fascists free rein to spread nonstop fascist propaganda over thousands upon thousands of talk shows and now through the internet.

        The only reasonable response is violence.

  • Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Man its like the UK is an authoritarian shit hole or something. Y’all need weapons and resistance. And no, I’m not American before someone asks.