Shortly after A Quiet Place: Day One’s record-breaking opening weekend, there was online outrage after it was reported that the horror movie would be available to watch at home within a month of its cinema release.
This was only an alleged release date and nothing has been confirmed by Paramount even now. It sparked a debate, however, about how the report would impact Day One’s chances at the box office, and a wider one about how movies just aren’t given the time to build their audiences at the cinema.
I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again. The cinema industry is being artificially propped up by wide spread exclusivity agreements to begin with.
If the theater truly offered a superior, worthwhile, experience then people would go regardless of if it’s streaming on day 1 or streaming on day 180
Right now most people go because they are essentially forced to go to one because it’s the only way to watch the movie they want to watch. (Inb4 someone says ThEYrE nOt foRcEd, ThEY cAn JuSt ChoOsE nOT tO WaTCh IT")
After upgrading to an oled TV theatres picture quality is just inferior. So now I really don’t want to watch movies in theatres.
Sure the sounds is still better, but it’s usually too loud for me, and lacks subtitles.
Add to that the ludicrous cost of theatre tickets and it’s just not worth it.
and lacks subtitles.
This I suspect is an underappreciated aspect of the dynamics at the moment. More broadly, it’s about the personalisation of the watching experience. Screen size, seating/lying position, noise and brightness, subtitles and their language, audio configuration (where you can optimise your home set up to help with dialogue clarity or “epicness”)
ludicrous prices? the nicest Dolby cinema tickets at AMC are like ten bucks
sure you spend more on snacks but you can also just not
At my local theatre the nice seats are $18 and the slightly cheaper normal seats are $15. That’s including fees for times outside of working hours.
A theatre outing for me and my wife costs more than a 4k uhd bluray for the movies we watch.
That’s not even including food, which if we go to a theatre we usually bring to avoid the high food prices.
I cheapskate the whole cinema-going experience - I have a monthly pass that is paid off by two or three visits a month (I go twice a week - one week last month I went 5 times, but 3 of those was a LotR marathon), plus I bring my own snacks and a bottle of water. Probably works out at the equivalent of three bucks a pop plus petrol, for big, wide reclining seats and iSense where available.
American cinema prices are not the only cinema prices.
what are prices like across the pond?
About 30 PLN for a standard seat in Poland, but that’s not really going to tell the whole story without looking at things like the median income, average prices of other goods etc.
For some reference, that’s the price for a month of standard Netflix over here.
Going to the cinema is expensive and takes effort, so quick home releases will harm a movie’s box office take but there’s also an audience that, post-Covid, won’t go to the cinema and I can see the temptation to milk that source if income too.
I would be among them and I know a few others as well. We’ll rent or buy a movie at home, but we’re not going to theaters anymore.
One problem, though, is that when movies are released for rent online at the same time that they are released in theaters, the charge might be something like $30. I could just wait a few months and buy it for cheaper.
there’s also an audience that, post-Covid, won’t go to the cinema
I’m not quite in that camp, but I’m damn close. There just aren’t a lot of movies coming out anymore that I am interested in enough to not want to wait, and where I feel that seeing it in the theater would add to the experience.
I’m privileged enough to have a damn good and big OLED screen at home, and the convenience of having complete control over my viewing experience can’t be ignored.
For me, going to the theater is for when I get something significant from the experience that I can’t get at home. That can be IMAX, 3D (on occasion), if the scale of the action is more immersive on a big screen, if it’s a film where the audio mixing shines with a theater’s atmos setup, or if it’s the kind of thinking film that gets more out of full focus and immersion (but I can still get this last one at home after the family is in bed).
The big problem is that outside of movies from franchises and directors I already know, I don’t usually know if it will hit any of those marks before I see it for the first time, and at that point it’s out of the theater. I use an ad blocker everywhere I can, and even when I do catch trailers, I’ve been burned before by misleading marketing.
I hope that studios start looking more at the long tail than opening week statistics, and that more movies start coming back to theaters after their initial run. I love the various “#th anniversary screenings happening lately”. I personally think that the opening week box office sales being the end all be all is an entirely outdated business practice that hasn’t adapted to modern times, lives, and changes in the media consumption landscape over the last 20 years.
No
Yes.
Maybe?
I don’t know
Can you repeat the question?
You’re not the boss of me noow
I think it depends on how quick they go to home media. There aren’t many movies these days that I have to absolutely see right away and can’t wait for a home release that’s not a rental, so the time spent in the theater has no relevance to me. I also go to small mom and pop theaters that charge $5-$6 per ticket even with day one releases. I can’t remember the last movie I saw in theaters that was an opening weekend except the 25th anniversary of The Phantom Menace, and that doesn’t count.
Edit: I just looked it up. I’m pretty sure TMNT: Mutant Mayhem was the last movie I saw in theaters besides TPM 25, and it was opening weekend.
