• Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Hexbear comes here to be the debate bros they try so hard to dunk on. They are dying looking for just one little morsel of dunk. Not a good showing, not a leftist unity moment lmao

    • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      The post exclusively attacks Hexbear’s ideological “left unity” position so it’s kinda fair game for people from that position to want to say something in its defence.

      The people doing marxist sectarianism instead of defending left unity are being dummies though.

      • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yes to the first part. Although, I’ll take this moment to say: hexbear’s left unity could use a tune up

        I’m just trying to talk about the latter behavior you described, which is kindof a symptom of what I mentioned

        • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah I agree.

          I think the issue here is that since left unity only has enforcement onsite, some are baited into sectarian arguments offsite.

          There’s also the issue that this is specifically posing left-unity as a marxist trick.

        • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Some of us are also just don’t believe the left is compatible with autocratic simps. I’ve tried to find common ground with hexbears and just don’t have the time. It’s hard to take their “left unity” seriously when I just get banned for questioning orthodoxy.

          Me: “Maybe the left should stop making the same mistakes over and over again.”

          Hexbears: Ok shitlib.

          Much unity.

      • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think the meme is a not-so-great way to address a dark topic.

        But what I was talking about was the behavior of hexbear users in response that is also not cool.

        But also I was just kinda fuckin around being entertained by the arguing and trying not to take it too seriously. I’m not here to take a strong stance. People seem to wanna make me take one but I’m gunna keep trying not to give a shit.

          • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’m not doing a bit, I’m just not trying to take this thread seriously.

            Bothsides in the context of arguing about leftist unity feels like a different thing entirely, but I’m also more trying to be “neither side” if that means anything idk I’m tired.

            I just want productive progress towards the end of capitalism as soon as possible. In the meantime I’m watching all the anticapitalists find reasons to hate each other forever.

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Oh no, there is unity. From the he bear users that came in as a brigade to drive the discussion out of the instance’s users. There’s more hexbear coments than any other instance what the fuck.

          • vasco@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Is it worth? I don’t get what’s going on with americans. Here we have both Anarchists and Communists doing stuff together ALL THE TIME. Even Trots sometimes are collaborative.

            I really admire a lot of stuff you do, and I try to replicate in order to help those who can’t read english. But it can’t be healthy to start all this argument online with people calling each other terrible names.

      • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m not complaining, I’m entertained.

        And mostly using that language was me trying to reference the meme, try to bring it all full circle.

        • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          Hexbear comes here to be the debate bros they try so hard to dunk on.

          What sort of behavior are you critiquing here?

          Personally I think “debate bro” stuff is more arguing for the sake of arguing/bending over backwards to defend even trivial or weak points, maybe with a sprinkling of going back-and-forth long after it becomes clear you’re at an impasse. I don’t see a lot of that here anyway.

          • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            It involves a wide variety of behaviors, including the stuff you said, but primarily the first thing that comes to mind for me is the behaviour of trying to force/coerce people to engage in debates/discussions that they don’t want to have or are otherwise unprepared to have, usually on the bad-faith preposition that anyone who is unwilling to participate in said debate/discussion must only be unwilling for the reason of being wrong.

            • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              26
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              debates/discussions that they don’t want to have or are otherwise unprepared to have

              I see your point, but I think this is seriously undermined when you have someone like OP who is willing to post all day about this, and occasionally willing to dip their toes into trying to raise real points, but then throws up their hands and says “hey it’s just a joke meme” whenever they’re in a tough spot.

              • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                8 months ago

                Eh, IMO it was more like they attempted to engage in response, and then tapped out when it went over their head. Or maybe they just got busy IRL.

                It doesn’t seem good to me to try and rationalize shitty behavior just because of a reason someone might deserve it.

                Also tho, if you wanna call them a lib and consider them officially dunked, you don’t need a certain response from them for it to work, you can just decide that.

                • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  24
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Or maybe they just got busy IRL

                  Looks like they’ve been posting pretty hard in this thread for at least 6-7 hours, often multiple paragraphs at a time.

                  It doesn’t seem good to me to try and rationalize shitty behavior just because of a reason someone might deserve it.

                  It’s not shitty behavior to make a political response to a political meme, or to point out when someone isn’t having a good faith conversation.

                  • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    It’s not shitty behavior to make a political response to a political meme, or to point out when someone isn’t having a good faith conversation.

                    Yes, but I’m not taking issue with just making political responses or pointing out bad-faith conversations. I’m taking issue with attempts to force/coerce engagement in a debate/discussion when someone doesn’t want to or is otherwise unprepared for debate/discussion.

                    I’m not trying to say any of this in the interest of proving anyone wrong or right or whatever. I would just like to see less of that behavior.